26.
(A) dismiss the necessity of classical technological paradigms
(B) diminish the complexity of existing diagnostic protocols
(C) derive the blueprint for next-generation bio-inspired sensors
(D) deviate from the established standards of modern electronics
The rapid proliferation of generative artificial intelligence has sent shockwaves through the corridors of higher education. While some educators embrace these tools as catalysts for innovation, others perceive them as a fundamental threat to academic integrity. The primary concern lies in the potential for students to outsource their critical thinking to algorithms, thereby _(27)_ the very foundations of the learning process. _(28)_ simple plagiarism, which is often detectable through conventional software, AI-generated content is uniquely synthesized, making it increasingly difficult to distinguish between human intuition and machine-calculated output. Consequently, universities are forced to re-evaluate their assessment methodologies. Many institutions are now pivoting back to proctored, in-person examinations to ensure authentic student performance. _(29)_, this shift is not without its detractors, who argue that retreating to traditional methods ignores the reality of a modern workforce where AI proficiency is becoming a prerequisite. They suggest that instead of banning these technologies, curricula should be _(30)_ to include AI literacy as a core competency. Ultimately, the goal is to strike a delicate balance between leveraging technological efficiency and preserving the sanctity of intellectual effort. If academia fails to adapt, it risks becoming _(31)_ in a world where the boundaries between biological and artificial intelligence are becoming progressively blurred.
答案:登入後查看
統計: A(0), B(1), C(1), D(0), E(0) #3911342
統計: A(0), B(1), C(1), D(0), E(0) #3911342