二、甲國人民 A 於乙國境內架設電腦網站，對丙國人民從事詐騙行為，而遭乙、丙兩國通緝，並潛逃至我國。甲、乙、丙三國司法機關得知後，雖與我國無引渡條約，均向我國提出引渡要求。試問甲、乙、丙三國依國際法相關規定是否對 A 均有管轄權？又我國依法應如何處理該等引渡問題？（25 分）

三、Please use 40 to 80 words to summarize the following article in English, do not copy any sentence in the excerpt.（20 分） Last February during his Fireside Hangout, President Obama explained that patent trolls (known more formally as Patent Assertion Entities, or PAEs) “don’t actually produce anything themselves. They’re just trying to essentially leverage and hijack somebody else’s idea and see if they can extort some money out of them.” This type of abusive patent litigation is a major problem. It’s also important to know what we’re not talking about here. We aren’t trying to make it harder to pursue legitimate intellectual property rights, or vigorously defend valid patents. Indeed, the United States has the best intellectual property protections in the world, and our system rightly ensures that these innovators are compensated for their creativity. The problem is when rogue companies make a business model out of exploiting and abusing the system, using it not to protect invention but to bring frivolous lawsuits to extract settlements from companies trying to serve American consumers. Bad patents in the system (such as those issued with broad or vague language) only compound the problem, and the issue extends far beyond any one industry.

相關申論題

相關試卷