3.台灣應對氣候變遷,也存在氣候不正義的問題嗎?若有,請舉例說明一個你認為最具代表性的案例,並提出一個以正義為政策目標的解決方案。(10points)

1.請分析《巴黎協定》比起《京都議定書》的框架有哪些面向的進步與突破。(10points)

2.到2021年底，《巴黎協定》生效將滿五年,請根據你的認識,分析這協議在執行上面臨到的一些困難與挑戰(5points)

1.科學家如何知道觀察到的氣候變化是由於人類活動引起的?(5points)

2.全球暖化背後的物理機制為何?(5points)

3.請詳細描述全球的水循環與碳循環(提示:從收支平衡的角度出發)(10points)

1.從2020年底到2021年初,氣象局連續發布低溫特報,請論述為何在全球暖化下,台灣在2020-2021的冬天還會特别冷?(10 points)

2.下圖一為全球觀測的平均降水在 1979 到 2008年的變化趨勢,圖a為濕季,圖b為乾季。請論敘你看到的變化,以及對於生態、社會、人類的影響為何?(10points)

3、下圖二為全球平均海平面過去20多年(1994-2015) 的變化,請描述在不同時間尺度的變化情形。(10points)

一、請從市場失靈與政府失靈的角度來探討台灣政府的口罩政策。(25分)

二、 請說明下面這一段話的內涵,並舉台灣的實例說明你是否同意這一段話的觀點。(25分)Facilitating inclusive citizen participation is a challenge for public managers because programs that are open to all citizens on a self-selection basis often draw unrepresentative participants. This is especially true for meetings that happen in person, such as public hearings, where attendance is often low. In comparison, the potential reach of online participation platforms might be far greater because citizens can take part at their convenience and mobile technologies allow for great flexibility. Moreover, citizens may be less intimidated by interactive platforms where they can search, select, and process information at their own pace. Online participation platforms thus have the potential to allow for more inclusive participation. 資料来源:van denBerg,A.C.,GiestS.N.,Greneveld,S.M. and Kraaij, W.(2020), Inclusivity in Online Platforms: Recruitment Strategies for Improving Participation of Diverse Sociodemographic Groups. Public Admin Rev, 80:991

110年 - 110 國立臺灣大學_碩士班招生考試_氣候變遷與永續發展國際碩士學位學程:全球變遷#100285