115年 - 115 中區縣市政府教師甄選策略聯盟_國小:英語科#140391

科目:教甄◆英文-國小 | 年份:115年 | 選擇題數:50 | 申論題數:0

試卷資訊

所屬科目:教甄◆英文-國小

選擇題 (50)

35. (A) seem particularly affect (B) seem to be particularly affected
(C) seem to particularly affect (D) seem to have particularly affected
The Russian fascination with Adidas is often mocked as a joke about tracksuits, yet the cultural weight of the brand developed from a more
complicated history than what the stereotype alone would suggest. During the late Soviet period, Adidas became one of the most recognizable
Western sports labels visible behind the Iron Curtain, especially through the 1980 Moscow Olympics, where its designs helped shape how modern
athletic prestige looked on television and in public memory. Soviet authorities were uneasy about openly displaying capitalist branding, but the very
need to modify or mute the label only reinforced its symbolic power: people knew what they were seeing even when the logo was reduced or
disguised.
After the Soviet collapse, that symbolic charge changed rather than disappearing. Adidas tracksuits became attached to the youth urban
subculture in Russia and to broader post-Soviet street culture, where they could signal toughness, aspiration, irony, or simple practicality all at once.
In other words, the brand survived not merely as sportswear, but as a social language. That is why the “obsession” is easy to oversimplify: it was
never only about fashion, and not even always about admiration. Adidas in Russia came to represent a rare convergence of scarcity, global modernity,
class performance, and meme-ready recognizability, which helps explain why it remained culturally vivid long after its first Soviet associations had
faded.
40. Which statement best reflects the author’s view?
(A) Adidas remained important in Russia because it represented several meanings at once.
(B) Adidas mattered only during the 1980 Olympics.
(C) The Russian interest in Adidas was entirely ironic from the beginning.
(D) The brand’s significance came solely from official Soviet approval.
Published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, the study followed over 20,000 adults in Sweden for nearly two decades. Participants,
aged 35 to 64 at the start, reported how much time they spent sitting and what activities they engaged in. Over the course of the study, 569 individuals
developed dementia. Researchers found a clear distinction between mentally passive and mentally active sedentary behaviors. Those who spent more
time in passive activities had a significantly higher risk of developing dementia, whereas those who engaged in mentally stimulating activities while
sitting had a lower risk.
The researchers also explored how behavior changes might influence outcomes. Replacing one hour of passive sedentary time with mentally
active activities was associated with about a 7% reduction in dementia risk. Simply adding an extra hour of mentally engaging activity reduced risk
by 4%, while combining cognitive engagement with physical activity led to an even greater reduction of 11%.
Mentally passive behaviors require little cognitive effort and include activities like watching TV or passively listening to music. In contrast,
mentally active behaviors involve attention, problem-solving, or interaction—such as reading, doing puzzles, knitting, or engaging in thoughtful
computer work. Even if two people spend the same amount of time sitting, the cognitive effects can differ greatly depending on the activity.
One explanation for these findings is that the brain benefits from regular stimulation. Engaging in mentally challenging tasks helps maintain
neural connections and builds “cognitive reserve,” the brain’s ability to adapt to aging. Passive activities, especially when prolonged, may fail to
stimulate these processes and could even reduce blood flow due to extended inactivity. Additionally, engaging activities are often more social or
interactive and may support better sleep—both factors linked to improved cognitive health.

申論題 (0)